Search for: "MURPHY V US"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
The onus on a plea of justification in the use of force lies on him who asserts it: Miska v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
The court’s eagle eyes spied a Tennessee appellate court decision that rejected the argument that a person’s life was a “thing of value” under the Tennessee statute:[T]he General Assembly intended for the Consumer Protection Act to be used by a person claiming damages for an ascertainable loss of money or property due to an unfair or deceptive act or practice and not in a wrongful death action.2011 WL 1259650, at *3 (quoting Kirksey v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
Two interesting points were decided by the Court of Appeal in Murphy v Wyatt: Where there is an agreement permitting a mobile home to be stationed on land which does not have planning permission for use as a caravan site (and therefore does not have a site licence), the subsequent granting of permission does not bring that agreement within the Mobile Homes Act 1983. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 1:37 am
In Rice v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:52 pm
Murphy: Was defendant’s conviction under Penal Code section 115 preempted by Vehicle Code sections 20 and 10501, subdivision (a)? [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Were we tempted to create this duty, the gentle tug of the First Amendment and the values embodied therein would remind us of the social costs.Winter v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:27 am
The case is Carri Johnson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:52 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 9:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
The system remains on hold, and cannot be used unless it survives the constitutional review that the Supreme Court is carrying out this Term, in the consolidated cases of Arizona Free Enterprise Club, et al., v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:39 am
In determining whether to apply Section 922 retroactively, the court used the framework setup by the Supreme Court in Fernandez-Vargas v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Pennant Service Company, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
Murphy of Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, Casper, Wyoming.Representing Appellee (Respondent): Paul D. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Murphy, Partner at Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP and Practice Center Contributor. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Murphy, Partner at Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP and Practice Center Contributor. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Murphy, 97 U.S. 120, 125 (1877), which asks whether an element of an accused product "performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way to obtain the same result" as an element of the patented invention. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm
Murphy of Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, Casper, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Eric E. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm
Sing Sing in New York.The place where in People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
While the Pullen decision essentially requiring local authorities to use the ‘least worst’ statutory provision available to them in order to comply wi [read post]
