Search for: "Management Services v. Development Associates" Results 1421 - 1440 of 2,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
  The points were made at a seminar on defamation law hosted by the Media Association of Jamaica, also reported in the Gleaner. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 3:21 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Divisional Court upheld the AFRAAT’s decision in United Food and Commercial Workers International Union v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm by familoo
Further : All of the examiners are fully licensed and trained by the most renowned polygraph associations such as British Polygraph Institute and APA (American Polygraph Association) which mean that our services are professional, fair and – what is most important – accurate. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
AEG will have incentives similar to Live Nation to provide better services at lower prices. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
The Ohio Willow Wood Company, No. 15-567 Allvoice Developments US, LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
   Marcel Chartier, a real estate investor and developer, sued Winnipeg businessman Serge Bibeau in 2018 after learning Bibeau had called him a thief to a business associate. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
The "Additional Provisions" also required Miracle Star to provide COLA's Department of Health Services Financial Services with an annual cost report for each mode of service and service delivery site. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 21 June there was a statement in open court in West v 24 Seven Fostering Services before HHJ Parkes QC. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Nevertheless, the Policy Statement will be published in the Federal Register, and comments may be submitted until July 3, 2023.[5] BACKGROUND The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)[6] makes it unlawful for any covered person or service provider to engage in any unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice.[7] The Dodd-Frank Act also provides the CFPB with rulemaking authority to define and prevent unfair, deceptive, and abusive… [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm by Andrew Pincus
Allcare Health Management Systems Octane Fitness LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:46 pm by admin
In a non-notifiable merger where there are potentially significant competition issues – i.e., either a potential substantial lessening of competition resulting from high market shares and barriers to entry or a potential substantial prevention of competition resulting from the removal of one of the merging parties as a poised competitor – the parties (and especially the Buyer) should assess the competition law risks (of both challenge and divestiture) before closing and develop… [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:47 am
  The plaintiffs asserted various claims against former directors, administrators and others associated with the funds. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:13 pm by David Jacobson
In Barker v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2012] FCA 942 the Federal Court gave judgment for a former employee who was made redundant against the Bank in the sum of $317,500 . [read post]