Search for: "Minor v. United States"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 7,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm
" Here, the Court essentially found that the false certification regarding minor breaches of the contract was not material to the government's decision to continue paying on the contract because the government continued to pay defendant on the contract long after the government knew of and defendant self-reported the violations.Defendant Black and Veatch was a large construction firm that contracted with the United States Agency for International Development… [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:12 am
United States, 559 U.S. 133 (2010)). [read post]
2 May 2014, 6:42 am
Feyenord challenged the use of the dog as constituting a search and seizure in violation of the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
(Ricci et al.. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:15 pm
And in NAACP v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:42 pm
§ 2 (2006), by willfully maintaining its monopoly power in the market for the sale of drugs for the treatment of PDA in the United States, and that Lundbeck’s conduct violated state law. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
”) State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:38 pm
In Sexual Minorities Uganda v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:34 am
The limits of the Leon good-faith exception were expanded ever wider in today's opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 11:29 am
However, in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:15 am
Contending that the law violates the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses, the complaint (full text) in Roake v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
The Notice of Appeal (full text) in Sexual Minorities Uganda v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 12:52 pm
In US v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:18 am
’” United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:18 am
’” United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
On the contrary, it provides that ‘[e]xcept when express provision therefor is made either in a statute of the United States or in these rules,’ the cost-shifting to the prevailing party otherwise applies to all cases. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:05 pm
Blum v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
