Search for: "New York v. Class" Results 1421 - 1440 of 5,901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 1:31 pm
Here's the V&E listing: Employer: Vinson & Elkins LLP (New York, NY) [view profile] Title: Litigation Associate Description: The NY Office of Vinson & Elkins LLP is looking for a junior-level (Class of '07-'08) litigation associate with 1-2 years of NY Law Firm experience to work in their Complex Commercial Litigation group. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
A policy decision by the employer is not subject to "pre-negotiations;" the impact of that decision on unit members is negotiableMatter of County of Erie & Erie County Sheriff v State of New York Pub. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Federal Judge Certifies Class Action in Stop-and-Frisk Case: Last month, we were pleased to report that New York District Judge Shira Scheindlin issued a preliminary injunction against the New York Police Department in Ligon v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:15 am
He will directly manage 100 ACLU staff attorneys in New York headquarters, oversee the organization’s U.S. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:11 pm by Brian Shiffrin
While the New York State Constitution sometimes provides greater protection of rights, in Robinson, the New York Court of Appeals refused to do so when it came to pretext stops. [read post]
11 May 2014, 2:37 am by Jeremy Saland
Forgery in the First Degree, pursuant to New York Penal Law 170.15, is a class C felony and Forgery in the Second Degree, pursuant to New York Penal Law 170.10, is a class D felony. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:52 am by Walter Olson
Chuck Grassley statement, earlier] Judge: Port Authority not liable over George Washington Bridge jumpers [Julia Marsh, New York Post] Tags: asbestos, class actions, Google, Illinois, suicide, technology [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
When Snapple inked a deal with the City of New York to sell its products to public schools, Matthew J. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am by Terry Moritz
(S.D.N.Y. 2011), was a putative class action in which the plaintiffs allege that their employer, Goldman, Sachs, has engaged in a pattern of gender discrimination against its female professional employees in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York City Human Rights Law. [read post]