Search for: "Online Information Service, Inc." Results 1421 - 1440 of 4,188
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 2:33 am by INFORRM
Particular reliance was placed upon the decision of the Court of Appeal in Durant v Financial Services Authority [2004] FSR 573. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:30 pm by Barry Sookman
Marakah, 2017 SCC Draft OPC Position on Online Reputation Towards Privacy by Design: Review of PIPEDA, Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
The technology allows online customers to make a purchase with just one click, without the need for inputting their billing and shipping information each time. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
HotChalk is in the business of helping universities create or expand their online degree programs. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Don Cruse
IMPERIAL PERFORMING ARTS, INC., No. 17-0660 One of the petition denials today involved a dispute over whether Texas’s public-information laws require state officials to reveal which pharmacy has been providing Texas’s execution drugs. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:45 pm by Bobby Chen
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained an emergency court order freezing the assets of Titanium Blockchain Infrastructure Services Inc. to halt “ongoing fraud” related to Titanium’s initial cryptocurrency coin offering. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Himber saw that the tickets he wanted were $49.50 each, but that there was a $15.25 online-service fee added to the price of each ticket. [read post]
14 May 2018, 11:19 am by Aaron Lancaster
According to AG Grewal, the new “unit will be tasked with making sure that we’re looking out for the interests of New Jersey’s residents whenever there’s a major data breach or improper use of customers’ online information. [read post]
13 May 2018, 9:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Professionals often post content online to attract attention, and similarly, amateurs often produce professional quality content. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:45 am by Susan Ross (US)
In the first count, the FTC alleged the BLU’s privacy policy representation that it limited disclosure of users’ information to third-party service providers only to the extent necessary to perform services was false or misleading under Section 5 of the FTC Act. [read post]
9 May 2018, 5:39 am by Phyllis H. Marcus and Bennett Sooy
China-based Gator Group Co., Ltd., and Sweden-based Tinitell, Inc., both market watch-like devices specifically designed for children that are integrated with online services which collect real-time location data allowing parents to monitor and communicate with their children. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
(previously Yahoo Inc.) following its failure to report a cybersecurity breach in 2014. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
They were free to make money elsewhere by working for competitors or private clients, even while actively remaining online. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:32 pm by Amanda Pickens
April 16, 2018) (purported class action seeking injunctive relief against Google, YouTube, and Alphabet, Inc. brought by parents alleging defendant have used their children’s personally identifying information for future commercial gain in violation of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act) Hagan, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:32 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
April 16, 2018) (purported class action seeking injunctive relief against Google, YouTube, and Alphabet, Inc. brought by parents alleging defendant have used their children’s personally identifying information for future commercial gain in violation of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act) Hagan, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:32 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
April 16, 2018) (purported class action seeking injunctive relief against Google, YouTube, and Alphabet, Inc. brought by parents alleging defendant have used their children’s personally identifying information for future commercial gain in violation of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act) Hagan, et al. v. [read post]