Search for: "Owen v. Owen" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
There are a number of resolved cases to report, including: Mr Phillip Scofield v Best, Clause 1, 30/03/2012; Mr Craig Whittaker MP v Halifax Evening Courier, Clause 1, 29/03/2012; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 28/03/2012; A man v Daily Mail, clause 1, 3, 5, 28/03/2012; Mr Nathan Roberts v Daily Mail, clause 1, 2, 28/03/2012; Mr Andrew Morgan v The Sun, clause 1, 28/03/2012; Mr Philip Bovey v The Independent, clause 12, 26/03/2012. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On 13 March 2012, Bean J granted an injunction in the case of BUQ v HRE. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
Pursuant to Estate of Owen, 855 N.E.2d at 612, the price for the Property was set at that time - September 3, 2001. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
On 11 November 2015, Sir Michael Tugendhat handed down judgment in the appeals of Bates v Weston; and Leeds United Football v Weston [2015] EWHC 3070 (QB). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
There was also a hearing in the case of LCG and others v OVD and others. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The House of Lords debated the Non-Consensual Sexually Explicit Images and Videos (Offences) Bill, a Private Members’ Bill introduced by Baroness Owen of Alderley Edge. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
Research Ethics Mullins-Owens, Heather L., Macey L. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
As many readers may know, Ehrlich's work in the 1970s was cited in Gregg v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 8:16 am
In 2002, in Atkins v Virginia, theUS Supreme Court outlawed the execution of people withretardation. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:22 pm
Companies will still need a license when they want to bring the research into their company laboratories or when they want to develop a product for the market.Given that stem cell research is within the area covered by the exemption of 35 USC 271(e)(1) as interpreted by Merck v. [read post]