Search for: "P. v. House"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 3,792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
Getting back to the opinion, the Court of Appeals went on to point out that[p]ursuant to the probation statute, a court may impose certain conditions upon probationers. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am
For example, in R (P) v Camden LBC [2004] EWHC 55 (Admin), it was held that an authority’s refusal to provide support under s.21 to a US national who was mentally ill did not breach Article 3 because he was able to obtain the necessary support in the US. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Resnick, 2011 ONSC 5083, at p.29. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
(Congratulations to Dennis P. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 4:41 pm
Ms H’s contention before the Administrative Court was that her suicidality had moved on since her earlier homelessness application and that her new application could not be described as being factually identical to the previous one (R v Harrow LBC ex p Fahia). [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:00 am
In Vriend v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Consider, for example, Riggs v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
(In some cases, like United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:40 am
New York City Housing Authority, July 7, 2016, Hall, P.). [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:57 pm
Also the case of R v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
District Judge P. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
See New York Yankees P’ship v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The House of Commons has voted against forcing the Government to hold part two of the Leveson inquiry. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:57 am
In April at [A’s] house party she gave [O] a blow job and then threw up. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:02 am
Arkay, LLC v City of Charleston, 2016 WL 3573147 (SC App. 6/29/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Special Use/Exception [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
He also explained that [p]ending before the Court are defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint and plaintiff's motion for sanctions. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 4:23 am
Mr Pidgeon twice sought to cancel Mr A’s housing benefit claim, saying that Mr P was moving out. [read post]
