Search for: "Parker v. Parker" Results 1421 - 1440 of 2,336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2017, 1:19 pm by Guest Blogger
From left: Abelardo Limon, Corky Sherman, Judge Craig Gargotta, Catherine Curtis, Judge Bill Parker, Judge Eduardo V. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 8:40 am by Randy Barnett
Randy Barnett • May 23, 2012 4:54 pm Jennifer Rubin and Kathleen Parker’s columns today have made me think of another Justice Roberts:  Justice Owen Roberts, who is famous for having switched his vote to uphold the New Deal programs in West Coast Hotel Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 1:19 pm by Guest Blogger
From left: Abelardo Limon, Corky Sherman, Judge Craig Gargotta, Catherine Curtis, Judge Bill Parker, Judge Eduardo V. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
The text of the petition in Parker v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Parker, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Thursday, July 25, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Delaware Court of Chancery, Kellner v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
"He disagreed with the appeals court ruling last March in the Parker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals reinstates the case and the plaintiffs are back in federal court.The case is Catzin v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division agreed, explaining that arbitration awards are entitled to collateral estoppel effect and, citing Guard-Life Corp. v Parker Hardware Mfg. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:51 pm by Jim Singer
Prometheus); (2) using a mathematical formula to adjust alarm limits for certain operating conditions in a catalytic conversion process (Parker v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff's claim that had he not resigned, he may have been able to hide his fraudulent activities, [*4]continue to collect fees, and reach an agreement with OCM is purely speculative and does not raise a triable issue of fact (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434-436 [2007]; GUS Consulting Gmb, 74 AD3d at 679; Phillips-Smith Speciality Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759… [read post]