Search for: "Parker v. State"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 9:34 am
” In Glatt v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 1:54 pm
March 5, 2009); Parker v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
PARKER AND CITY OF HOUSTON, No. 13-0047 . [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
” The complaint alleges Sun made threats against officials with the city, interfered with a lawful court order, violated state custodial interference laws, and engaged in disorderly conduct. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:20 am
The Debtors filed a petition seeking relief under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Chapter 7 Case"). [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:07 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
CRUM, Defendant.Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-3522-B.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:02 am
Diehr and Parker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972), and Parker v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
Du Cros Ltd. (1913) AC 624 at 634, 635) Lord Parker of Waddington having remarked upon the difficulty of finding the right criterion by which to determine whether a proposed mark is or is not "adapted to distinguish" the applicant's goods defined the crucial question practically as I have stated it, and added two sentences which have often been quoted but to which it is well to return for an understanding of the problem in a case such as the present. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Parker v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 2:06 pm
Burgess, 281 So.2d 643 (1972); Parker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm
Parker, the earlier precedent on which it is based), Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:26 pm
In Maxon v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 9:17 am
See Parker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:55 pm
Judge Barrington Daniel Parker Jr. re-stated the three central claims of torture, conspiracy to torture, and obstruction of access to the courts. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Kansas: Parker v. [read post]
