Search for: "People v Court" Results 1421 - 1440 of 61,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 1:25 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Humphrey, a death penalty case involving a Black defendant, a White victim and an all-White jury is whether the Georgia courts erred in failing to recognize race discrimination under Batson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 12:14 pm
In 2006 the Michigan Supreme Court changed the law to limit children and incompent people (like someone in a coma) from collecting No-Fault benefits from their own insurance company in the case of Cameron v Auto Club. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:31 am
Coleman v Attridge Law (a Firm) and Another Case C-303/06 Court of Justice of the European Communities “The prohibition of direct discrimination against and harassment of disabled people in employment, provided for in the Community disability directive, was not limited to employees who were themselves disabled but extended to unequal treatment and harassment of a non-disabled employee for reasons connected with the disability of his child. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:17 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, June 24, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries: Crespo v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Brandon Gatto
The goal of the endeavor is to counteract the 2010 US Supreme Court [official website] decision of Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
On February 23, 2010 a divided Panel of the Appellate Division, First Department, New York Supreme Court ruled in People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
On February 23, 2010 a divided Panel of the Appellate Division, First Department, New York Supreme Court ruled in People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 8:09 am by Kevin Smith
  Last week the Court finally granted certiorari in the case of Costco v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in People v Moore, People v Doyle, People v Colon and People v LoVerde that the testimony of the victim must be corroborated if the offense charged is intrinsically related to or committed in aid of affecting the sex crime. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:57 am
I agree with the California Supreme Court on this one. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:14 pm
The case then went up to and down from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 4:59 pm
We know that last month’s Supreme Court ruling in Heller v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 2:15 pm by Kristin Lamb
Supreme Court hopefully will provide some clarity on this issue when it hears the case Georgia, et al. v. [read post]