Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 1421 - 1440
of 22,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The case, Terry v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
" (Mincey v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 11:28 am
The Third Department applied this principle yesterday in People v Alteri, 2008 NY Slip Op 00302. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:37 am
Held v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:23 am
Flick, Case No. 138258, and People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:36 pm
We therefore conclude, based upon the record before us, that " a hearing should be held to promote justice [because] the issues raised by the motion are sufficiently unusual and suggest searching investigation' " (People v Ausserau, 77 AD2d 152, 155, quoting People v Crimmins, 38 NY2d 407, 416; see People v Kearney, 78 AD3d 1329; People v Nicholson, 222 AD2d 1055, 1057). [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:48 am
Eight years ago, in a case called Hosanna-Tabor Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:35 pm
But I agree with Justice Jenkins that it's okay under the "emergency aid" exception. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:45 am
At least you can sleep well, Chris, knowing that you've made the job easier for future would-be bank robbers who read the California Appellate Report.Anyway, thanks for the tips, Justice Mihara.P.S. - How about a little slam on Judge Bocanegra for upping the restitution order from $200 to $10,000 as a result of Wardell's previous successful appeal?! [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:47 pm
I agree with Justice Yegan that the shooting was for the benefit of a gang and that the enhancement was thus proper. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm
So it was a "good" opinion for the time, despite the fact that it was (to modern eyes) clearly absurd.I had these thoughts when I read this opinion by Justice McDonald. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:42 pm
And the justices agree, which is why today's decision is unanimous.There's more work to be done here, for sure. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:50 pm
After Rose Bird, are you really going to be the justice who lets a cop-killer go free? [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:04 am
But it's over the dissent of Justice Haerle. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
Justice Mosk does a wonderful job writing a seventeen-page "UCC For Dummies" primer precisely for people like me. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:59 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts asked today whether Arizona v. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 3:52 pm
This question occurred to me when I recently reread Dickerson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:27 pm
" Oops.Okay, now, normal people, in a traditional setting, might say: "Oh, sorry. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:15 pm
"Sims' opinion came in the case of Barnett v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
Hammon v. [read post]
