Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2010, 11:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) In Pucci v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
As we have reported in a post last week Lord Neuberger’s made general comments about anonymity in court proceedings in the court of appeal. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
And Lord Justice Laws is right to say that it is for the courts to interpret and not make the law. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:07 am
Lord Hope and Lady Hale give the judgment of the Court. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:46 pm
Footnote for privacy/publicity people: this case was originally listed as P v E, apparently because of the alleged commercial sensitivity of a percentage figure in one of the clauses of the 1999 Agreement. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
At an event marking the first anniversary of the “Libel Reform Campaign”, Justice minister Lord McNally said that English libel law is “not fit for purpose”. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Although Mr Seal ultimately lost, his claim – and in particular a strong dissenting judgment by Baroness Hale in the House of Lords – highlights the tricky line the state must tread in relation to people with mental health problems in relation to their access to justice. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm
Such orders were made in the cases of ASG v GSA, DFT v TFD, AMM v HXW and KJH v HGF. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
A TRANSCRIPT OF THE COMMENTARY IN THE FIRST TELEVISED UK TRIAL R V KEVIN PIETERLAG AND JOHNNY ‘ROBBERS’ ROBBER Charon QC: Good morning everybody…Welcome to The Old Bailey on day one of a five day trial in the case of R v Kevin Pieterlag and Johnny ‘Robbers’ Robbers. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
With human health at the apex of this system, the assessment of the measures adopted to secure any of these aims is not, as Lord Steyn suggested in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532, a ”one size fits all” test. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am
REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:03 am
Presumably, this will be on the agenda for Lord Neuberger’s upcoming review of libel law. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
For example, in Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
People of Freedom – known as PDL (Popolo della Libertà) – symbol (Class 46) Kenya Kenya’s Anti-counterfeit Agency comes out with blazing guns (Afro-IP) Netherlands District Court of The Hague – Tédé v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
The House of Lords however, in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley, [2002] 2 AC 164, complicated matters. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am
At the moment the range of tests for persecution on return is dizzyingly confusing: Refugee Convention – a reasonable degree of likelihood for f (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958) Article 3 ECHR -”substantial grounds” (Vilvarajah v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 248) Extradition – balance of probabilities for past and existing facts (Fernandez v Government of Singapore [1971] 1 WLR 987) Extradition – degree of… [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
A petition by X and Y to appeal to the House of Lords was dismissed. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
The bill presented by Ms Campbell’s lawyers at the end of the case was for over £1m, almost 60% of which related to the House of Lords appeal: Campbell v MGN Ltd (No 2) ([2005] 1 WLR 3488). [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:14 am
I want to explore whether more people can resolve their disputes in a way that leads to faster and more satisfactory solutions. [read post]
