Search for: "People v Word" Results 1421 - 1440 of 17,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2016, 6:03 am
That's the key word of Trump's campaign and Trump's life.I must say that — whatever happens in this crazy Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:27 am
”The leading case on forfeitures is Ward v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:29 am
That's a word that people have traditionally used — this is my observation — to portray a woman as incapable of standing her ground and dealing with emotional turmoil. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
The natural and ordinary meaning Citing Lord Bridge in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Master Bell emphasised that in order to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the words of which a plaintiff complains, one must consider the context in which the words were used and the mode of publication [8]. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
These were in response to Stonewall adverts, also on London buses, which promoted gay marriage rights with the slogan ”Some people are gay. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
In other words, even if there is a flagrant breach of the Editors’ Code that IPSO is sworn to uphold, IPSO often won’t look into the matter if the complainant does not meet its criteria. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 2:16 am by Raynold Tlhavani
The March 2016 ruling of the ombud for financial services providers in Khoza v Bensure Management Services  is worth reading because it reminds us of an FSP’s obligations regarding an amendment to a policy and the meaning of the word “event”. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:47 am
(To be sure, that didn't involve a state legislature, but one doubts that any of the justices in the conservative plurality would have changed one word of their opinion had it been the Washington or Kentucky legislature.) [read post]