Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 1421 - 1440 of 5,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2014, 6:23 am
`had [evidentiary] value where people were talking about stuff  [Plunkett] believed to be drugs. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
As for the first imputation, during his exchange with the journalist, Superintendent Guerin spoke of the police statement in the LCRA proceeding and had said: … she’s asking these people – well, you know, she’s started to cross-examine them about the statement. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:36 am
Given that Texas law adequately complies with the new SCOTUS ruling and we lock up more people per capita than the rest of the country, I just don't buy the argument that the criminal justice system can't function under these restrictions. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 12:15 pm
 That's a fine line, and smart people could (and would) argue about whether that line was crossed here.But the line was at least approached. [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
Ancestry Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Advertising “Background Reports” on People–Lukis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
Massachusetts, was  that the  reliability of scientific evidence made cross-examination unnecessary. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am by INFORRM
Comparative human rights law Baldassi & Others in 2020 reaches the same conclusion as the Supreme Court of the United States in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. [read post]