Search for: "People v. Harris"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 2,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2025, 11:49 am
See Mata v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2025, 8:17 am
At trial, the district court admitted the fourth threatening letter sent to Harris by the defendant as res gestate and 404(b) evidence, despite Harris never having received the letter. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 7:15 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court, in Powell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:30 pm
Government does not invest, it spends, and it spends other people’s money.And the fallacy of socialism is that it works out REALLY well until you run out of other people’s money. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
“The word ‘class’ comfortably encompasses a group of people linked by nationality,” said the court, particularly when the statutory text itself allows the president to suspend the entry of “all aliens. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am
The HPD has a documented history of lying to solve cases and to send people to prison. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
Harris, 188 N.J. 415 (2006), the Legislature enacted Public Law 2006, Chapter 103,establishing civil unions for same-sex couples effective February 19, 2007. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:47 pm
Full text available online at http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/15/1/08-0299_article.htm Harris, JP, et al. [read post]
23 May 2025, 1:38 pm
District Court, with a memorandum and order issued March 4 in the MSPB case, Harris v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
Even as a judge on the Eighth Circuit, Harry Blackmun was substantially more liberal than President Nixon realized, but it was not until after he wrote the majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:59 pm
How about a mandate requiring everyone to see the most recent Harry Potter movie? [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
I might think the Constitution should reach more of national life than another person; I think the Court was wrong, for instance, to overrule Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 8:03 am
And of course in Bluman v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 7:03 am
With the words “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” the amendment established the citizenship of Black people, including former enslaved people freed during the war, who had been denied that right in the Supreme Court’s notorious 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
