Search for: "People v. Jackson" Results 1421 - 1440 of 2,307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  The Law Society Gazette had a piece on the case: “People who live in glass houses shouldn’t make article 8 claims”. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 3:32 am by SHG
How quickly people forget that it’s the fact that the Court is not subject to popular whim that enabled it to decide Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:00 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the case that overturned the right to an abortion as found in Roe v Wade. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:28 am by John Elwood
(People born in the other territories — Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 2 and 3 December 2024 Saini J continued to hear the trial Smith & Jackson v Surridge (QB-2022-000858) which began on 25 November 2024. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:00 pm by Liz Campbell
As was reiterated earlier this year in Lynch v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform, preventative justice “has no place in our legal system” (People v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am by Scott Bomboy
Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) overturned Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) Cruddas v Calvert, heard 9, 10 and 11 December 2014 (Jackson, Ryder and Christopher Clarke LJJ) OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated… [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
Jackson, which left the Texas “bounty-hunter” abortion law in effect, calling it a “purely a procedural decision. [read post]