Search for: "People v. Jones"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
Jones involves a question that is common in the class-action context: What happens when it’s not practical for the defendant to pay every member of the class? [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:05 pm
Jones, 158 N.C. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm
I haven’t looked comprehensively at state cases, but some of the cases that I stumbled on, or that are frequently discussed in the other cases in this area, are summarized below: People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:05 pm
Jones, 158 N.C. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
Americans United Inc. (1974), and Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:47 pm
Jones, Under the Umbrella: Assessing Recent Court Decisions that Promote Public Access to the Law The key principle: law must be available, and people need access to it. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:40 am
The Bush v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:27 am
Jones, Esq. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Tracking people with GPS devices raises privacy issues. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:23 pm
“The law doesn’t force people to use the drugs,” said federal government lawyer Paul Riley. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 8:50 am
In State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 2:00 am
” See Sanders v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:01 am
The Supreme Court’s recent Jones v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:04 pm
These employeesworked at the same facility where plaintiff worked, they were supervised by thesame people that supervised plaintiff (Jimenez and Sandgren), and their supervisors were, in turn, supervised by Jones. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:12 am
Supreme Court precedent is flatly contrary, see Jones v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:15 am
Read more about the case before the Supreme Court, US v. [read post]
