Search for: "People v. London" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,929
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 12:34 am by Anita Davies
At a speech at Middle Temple Sands highlighted problems that arose in London and Washington during the war on terror. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm by Lawrence Higgins
[Link] IBC will hold a Standards and Patents Conference in London on November 16th & 17th. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:03 am
A panel of sensible and well-informed people will comment briefly on the paper (which is based on Galit’s PhD thesis) before it’s thrown open to the floor for general discussion. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am by Daniel Sokol
For many people, a life in MCS is a more terrifying prospect than a purely vegetative existence. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:47 pm by admin
‘[1]   Foremost, the Act aims to encourage more people to apply to adopt and build confidence in the adopter assessment process. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
Even if Ms Bah had been accepted as having priority need, conditions in London would have meant a considerable period in temporary accommodation until a permanent offer was made. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
Even if Ms Bah had been accepted as having priority need, conditions in London would have meant a considerable period in temporary accommodation until a permanent offer was made. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:58 am by Ken
That abuse was at the heart of the case Kelo v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:43 am by Matthew Flinn
Voyias v Information Commissioner and the London Borough of Camden EA/2011/0007 – Read Judgment The First Tier Tribunal has overturned a decision of the Information Commissioner and ordered Camden Council to provide information about empty properties in the borough to a former member of the Advisory Service for Squatters. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:06 am by familoo
’ That ‘violence’ goes beyond phsyical harm or threats of physical harm was confirmed by the the Supreme Court in Yemshaw v London Borough of Hounslow [2011] UKSC 3 where in the context of section 177(1) of the Housing Act 1996, a husband shouting at his wife would be sufficient conduct to fall within that Act’s definition of ‘violence. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
  For example see Mr Justice King’s provisional view in NEJ v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:13 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
The inspirational trigger is me cooking meatballs in red wine and tomato sauce whilst listening to an argument on Radio 4’s ‘PM’ programme about planning permission v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm by Lawrence Higgins
The Pledge that Graham proposes is very simply written: No first use of software patents against companies with less than 25 people. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
That's very gratifying when we consider that every one of these people is or was sufficiently interested in IP to want to receive news of all its posts. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:09 am by J
” Wise words indeed, and very apt for the case of Ayres and others v Roberts and others CHY09726 (Central London CC; transcript via Westlaw), where HHJ Cowell has pointed out that the LVT is sending misleading and legally inaccurate information to litigants. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:09 am by J
” Wise words indeed, and very apt for the case of Ayres and others v Roberts and others CHY09726 (Central London CC; transcript via Westlaw), where HHJ Cowell has pointed out that the LVT is sending misleading and legally inaccurate information to litigants. [read post]