Search for: "People v. More" Results 1421 - 1440 of 43,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2013, 11:21 am by David Friedman
They represent the more reasonable range of their respective factions. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:46 am by Kent Scheidegger
  There is also another dimension that might be labeled "libertarian" v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
That's why criminal cases have captions like State of Ohio v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
The careful readjustment now underway does nothing more than recognize property’s status as a civil and human right, one that needs serious constitutional protection if people are to flourish as citizens, family members, and workers. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:48 am by INFORRM
One of the more intriguing cases of the last few months is Narbutas v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am by INFORRM
In Haaretz.com et al v Mitchell Goldhar (SCC case no. 37202), the Supreme Court of Canada is asked to decide whether the court in Ontario has jurisdiction to hear a defamation claim arising from an article widely published in Israel, but read online by a number of people in Canada. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Deepak Gupta
Here's a roundup of some recent commentary on AT&T v. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 3:36 pm by Brian Shiffrin
More recently, in People v Weinstein (42 NY3d 439 [2024), the Court of Appeal reversed convictions for criminal sex act and rape on a finding that it was prejudicial error to admit testimony of other women regarding alleged sexual assaults of the similar to those charged. [read post]
31 May 2014, 11:13 am by Jamison Koehler
  And in fact, people who are familiar with the criminal offenses of failing to stop or fleeing a police officer would be even more reluctant to leave. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:30 pm
 If an insurance company doesn't want to cover that, they can say so.And, perhaps, in the future, will.Only causing people to hate insurance companies even more than they do already. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:06 pm by Brian Shiffrin
We note, however, that such questions were improper (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932; People v Paul, 212 AD2d 1020, 1021, lv denied 85 NY2d 912; People v Edwards, 167 AD2d 864, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). [read post]