Search for: "People v. Sans" Results 1421 - 1440 of 3,252
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 7:13 am by Dean Freeman
The project started in Sweden and has caught on in cities like New York, San Francisco and Portland. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:19 am by Dina Townsend
At the regional level, the African Charter includes in article 24 the right of all peoples to “a generally satisfactory environment favourable to their development. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs hold taxicab permits in Houston and San Antonio. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The plaintiff in this case is listed as "Naruto, a Crested Macaque, by and through his Next Friends, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:38 am by Glenn Gerstell
  On their side was a 1979 Supreme Court ruling (Smith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
September: EFF joined the ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties, the Cato Institute, the Brechner First Amendment Project, and the First Amendment Coalition in an amicus brief defending the free speech rights on people on supervised release from prison. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:46 am by Joy Waltemath
Instead, the high-level employee could have waited to receive confirmation as to whether the threat was official before resigning (Brandon v. [read post]