Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 3,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
” (quoting Ramirez v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
Phillips, 4 Wheat. 73 (1819); Lord v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 3:33 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:57 am
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 12:58 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:49 pm
People v Phillips ruled that such a claim is precluded following a plea of guilty, as is the case here. [read post]
Symposium: The Masterpiece ruling calls for increased vigilance of discrimination in the marketplace
7 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
This week, the Supreme Court handed down a much-anticipated decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 5:44 am
The plaintiffs’ claims regarding the consequences and damages flowing from the defendants’ alleged failure to request that a title company provide a title report by a certain date are conclusory and speculative (see May Dock Lane, LLC v Harras Bloom & Archer, LLP, 222 AD3d at 637; 126 Main St., LLC v Kriegsman, 218 AD3d 524, 525; Sierra Holdings, LLC v Phillips, Weiner, Quinn, Artura & Cox, 112 AD3d 909, 910). [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
In order to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, defendants had to present evidence in admissible form establishing that plaintiff is “unable to prove at least one necessary element of the legal malpractice action” (Giardina v Lippes, 77 AD3d 1290, 1291 [4th Dept 2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 702 [2011]), e.g., ” that the defendant attorney failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed by a member of the legal… [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 10:26 am
Extrinsic evidence is a secondary source and, as Birss J summarized Phillips v AWH Corp 415 F.3d 1303 (Feb Cir 2005), "may be less significant than the intrinsic record in determining the legally operative meaning of the claim language...Care must therefore be taken... [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 11:59 pm
Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., ---U.S. ----, ---- n. 6, 127 S.Ct. 2499, 2511 n. 6, --- L.Ed.2d ----, ---- n. 6 (2007); Phillips v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
At 10 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in CSX Transportation v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:48 am
Phillips, 468 F.3d 1264, 1265 (10th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1312, 127 S. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:40 pm
The Court granted a Motion for Protective Order yesterday in Delhaize America, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:29 am
Panasia Estates, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:47 am
Fisher & Phillips believes “this is good news for employers. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:54 am
Yesterday the Mississippi Supreme Court stayed further proceedings in the Union Carbide v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 2:08 pm
Case Name: Wolf v. [read post]
