Search for: "Russell v. Ins*" Results 1421 - 1440 of 2,192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2013, 8:49 am by Rachel Sachs
  Also for this blog, Kevin Russell reviews Wednesday’s oral argument in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm by Kirk Jenkins
On Thursday morning, the Illinois Supreme Court filed its decision in Russell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  On Thursday, April 18, the Court's decision in Russell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
” Tuesday’s opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
“I remember I got to discuss constitutional law with Russell Pearce,” he said. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm by hls
Jonathan Litman- requires pro bono service prior to the bar makes life difficult for students but is a good policy ; California takes lead on Civil Gideon. 10:53- 3 good  arguments for expanding civil gideon:  1) we will all save money if other people get counsel 2) protecting rule of law is good for business and consumers 3) strengthen our own best selves. 10:54- Justice is JUST – US 10:55- Panel 1: Russell Engler, Rebecca Sandefur, Mark Ladov, and… [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:30 pm by Douglas
Com a expulsão dos cristãos do solo sagrado em 1303, os templários entraram na mira do papa Clemente V que, junto do rei da França, Filipe, o Belo, conspirou para a destruição da Ordem do Tempo Ordem do Templo. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:30 pm by Douglas
Com a expulsão dos cristãos do solo sagrado em 1303, os templários entraram na mira do papa Clemente V que, junto do rei da França, Filipe, o Belo, conspirou para a destruição da Ordem do Tempo Ordem do Templo. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
 And Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am by Mary Dwyer
 Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
  [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:52 am by Emma Durand-Wood
At his Arizona Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog, Lawrence Koplow wrote about Arizona State Hospital v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am by Kali Borkoski
Kevin Russell, also of Goldstein & Russell, filed an amicus brief on behalf of former senators in support of the respondents in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
” Wednesday’s oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]