Search for: "STATE v MURPHY"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 2,304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2013, 11:30 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:55 am
HOLMES DISSENTIn Abrams v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:43 pm
Wexler In a scathing opinion issued today in EEOC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Bozena Smith v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 2:13 pm
Genesco Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:14 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:55 am
By Kevin Smith and Brian Murphy On July 9, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Torres et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:26 am
Although an employer was victorious on summary judgment, its request for attorneys’ fees under the ADA and Sec. 1927 was rejected after a federal district court found that an EEOC determination letter concluding the employer discriminated against an employee provided a reasonable, non-frivolous basis for her lawsuit (Murphy v Samson Resources Co, June 21, 2013, Frizzell, G). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
Murphy, 465 U. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The duty of good faith and fair dealing, however, is not without limits, and no obligation can be implied that “would be inconsistent with other terms of the contractual relationship” (Murphy v American Home Prods. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:11 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm
Dave Murphy, founder and executive director of Food Democracy Now! [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
Tata Sons Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:46 am
By Brian Murphy and Jonathan Sokolowski On May 29, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Cuevas v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 5:37 am
Equal Opportunity Employment Comm'n v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 1:05 pm
Judge Murphy applied the teeth in Rule 37 to sanction two of the parties -- Allison and Stathopoulos -- in an Order this week in BOGNC v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:42 pm
Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, Case No. 12-60291.Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:02 am
Caldera v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Marshall v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 4:00 am
This week's summaries concern: Trade Regulation / Implied terms: Murphy v. [read post]
