Search for: "Smith v. Childs" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2009, 11:20 pm
As I noted in an earlier post, in the 1979 Smith v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:11 am
Smith, Assistant Attorney General.Facts/Discussion: Ceja was convicted of sexual exploitation of a minor by possessing child pornography. [read post]
18 May 2009, 4:04 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) OT (A Child), Re [2009] EWCA Civ 409 (14 May 2009) Secretary of State for Defence v Smith, R (on the application of) [2009] EWCA Civ 441 (18 May 2009) Court of Appeal (Criminal Divison) Girma & Ors, R. v (Rev 1) [2009] EWCA Crim 912 (15 May 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Taylor v HMP [...] [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:54 am
Based on those 41 pictures, a grand jury indicted Luken for possession of child pornography.U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:08 am by SC Divorce and Disabilty
" Craig, 358 S.C. at 554, 595 S.E.2d at 841 (quoting Smith v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:57 am
 A7171A Abbate (MS) -- Provides procedures for resolution of disputes between a public employer and Suffolk county probation officers Same as S 4872 BLURB : Civ Serv. res ds Sflk Cty pk polLast Act: 04/24/09 amend and recommit to governmental employees04/24/09 print number 7171aA7196A Weisenberg -- Creates the mandatory ignition interlock program; repealer Same as S 27-B BLURB : V & T L. mand ignition interlock Last Act: 04/24/09 amend and… [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 6:18 am
Smith, 973 F.2d 1374, 1375 (8th Cir. 1992) (holding that a search was not coerced when officers entered the premises with their guns drawn); United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Duty of Care to Fetus Anne Posno of Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP discussed Paxton v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Smith , No. 08-1477 Sentence for distribution of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant defendant a continuance for another chance to present expert testimony; 2) the district court correctly applied 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553 (a) when sentencing defendant, and did not fail to adequately address the factors set forth in the statute; and 3) there is no evidence that the district court's tangential statements about… [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:37 am
Summary of Decision issued April 16, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Bowser v. [read post]