Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 3,616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Superior Court (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 197, 213-214.) [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 6:00 am
Superior Court, no. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
See, e.g., Hansen v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:17 am
The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Five, ruled in Dickson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:01 pm
Ayana Hill v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:47 am
More directly related to the California SSPA was the series of cases from Fresno County, California, under the pre-2010 version of that state's SSPA. [read post]
4 Jan 2025, 10:25 am
In contrast, the state courts of California are familiar with handling these matters and there is a robust body of substantive law and procedural protections in the Superior Court which this Court is reluctant to disturb without good cause. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm
Prager of the Superior Court of California granted class certification as to a class of approximately 21,000 current and former Apple retail and corporate employees on claims alleging Apple failed to provide timely meal and rest breaks as required under California Law. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 12:27 pm
Paz v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:27 pm
So off to state court the property owner went, filing suit in California Superior Court on its claims for compensation under the California Constitution's just compensation requirement. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Thus, the class action will remain in California state court. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:28 pm
The case of Brown v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 10:57 am
Ironically, the main California precedent that the court invoked was a 1998 decision by the California Supreme Court, Curran v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v The Superior Court (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1029. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Superior Court, 134 Cal. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:39 pm
Thus, a ruling by a California state trial court, granting summary judgment to Domino’s on the injured employee’s claims, was reversed.The injured employee claimed that both the franchisee and Domino’s were the employers of the harassing employee and were vicariously liable for his actions under the doctrine of respondeat superior. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:51 pm
In August 2017, a California appellate court held in Esparza v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th 377, 383.) [read post]
