Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2009, 2:01 pm by Beck, et al.
Don't look now, but things have gotten a bit weird for Third-Party Payor (TPP) lawsuits in the District of Minnesota. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:38 am by Chuck Ramsay
Defendant shall receive access to the source code from CMI pursuant to the instructions and parameters set forth in State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:12 pm by John W. Arden
Kinetic Co. failed to state claims under consumer fraud laws of states other than Minnesota. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:56 pm by Chuck Ramsay
Minnesota’s Frye-Mack standard has been steadily evolving since the early 20th century, and by the 1980's the Minnesota Supreme Court summarized the test in State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 9:01 am by Seth Leventhal
Pending before the Minnesota Supreme Court and argued on December 8, is Citizens State Bank ("CSB") vs. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:27 pm
A Minnesota district judge rejected claims brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act based on the receipt of unsolicited text messages. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:11 am
Wednesday, the federal district court rejected the libel claim, reasoning that the charter school was a governmental entity, and governmental entities can’t sue for libel: As a threshold matter, Plaintiff contends that as a public entity, TIZA cannot sue for defamation or related claims under New York Times Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
InfoUSA (Patently-O)   US Copyright Bloggers denounce ‘parasite’ label at FTC summit regarding future of journalism (Ars Technica) Using faulty data to demand settlements from innocent surfers – Princeton researcher wrongly accused (Ars Technica) US Dept of Education funds Bookshare to make open textbooks accessible (Creative Commons)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Microsoft – The Xbox Live bans: A cautionary tale of the Terms of Service… [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 1:03 am
" The District Court denied the utilities motion for summary judgment, certified the question to the Minnesota Court of Appeals, which affirmed (opinion by Lansing, J.) and the Minnesota Supreme Court granted the petition for review. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:13 am
They've cited, most recently, the Court's 5-4 decision this year in Ashcroft v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 10:14 am
 Ruling without full briefing or a hearing, and with no dissent noted, the Court apparently overturned the death sentence of a Florida veteran whose "combat service unfortunately left him a traumatized, changed man," as the Court put it in Porter v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am by Andrew Frisch
On the other hand, the Department cited a Minnesota district court, which found that “employees who had a ‘primary duty to sell [the company's] lending products on a day-to-day basis’ directly to consumers” were not exempt. 69 Fed.Reg.. 22,122, 22,145 (Apr. 23, 2004), quoting Casas v. [read post]