Search for: "State v. Alexander" Results 1421 - 1440 of 2,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm by Sandy Levinson
The most important single Supreme Court opinion in our history is undoubtedly that written by John Marshall in McCulloch v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 8:52 am by John-Paul Boyd
However, Russell Alexander posted some comments yesterday on the recent decision in Kirby v Kirby that has given me pause for thought. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Keith Alexander replied, “On those, you’re starting to get closer to what would be [considered war]” (Harris, 2009, brackets in original). [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the court made no such finding here, and instead, improperly delegated the parenting time determination to the father, the error required reversalIn Matter of C.M. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
What does Brexit mean for data protection: part 2 The Panopticon Blog has a post about the case of Campbell v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2018] UKUT 372 (AAC) – Death and the DPA. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 5:46 am by Scott Bomboy
In a petition to the Supreme Court filed in Department of State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Alexander Payne, Note, Rebuilding the prevent defense: why unethical agents continue to score and what can be done to change the game, 13 VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF ENTERTAINMENT & TECHNOLOGY LAW 657 (2011)David Pepper, Comment, Anand v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In a country (and culture) that sometimes appears to believe that prevention of even one terrorist attack justifies immense costs in terms both of money and deprivations of ordinary liberty, it is at least worth noting the remarkable indifference of much of the public—and certainly the whole of the Republican Party—to the costs attached to offering the kind of capacious interpretation of the Second Amendment instantiated in the recent case of New York State Rifle & Pistol… [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 6:12 am
A case filed on July 10, 2009 in the New York Eastern District Court by Miguel Agui, Alexander Reyes and James Gipson v T-Mobile USA will provide the answer. [read post]