Search for: "State v. Burns" Results 1421 - 1440 of 3,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2022, 10:48 am by Radhika Rao
 As Justice Blackmun presciently stated in his dissent in Webster v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm by Kevin Sheerin
”   Citing Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 109 AD2d 92, affd 67 NY2d 562, the Appellate Division said that the legislative history of §50-a indicates that the "statute was intended to apply to situations where a party to an underlying criminal or civil action is seeking documents in a police officer's personnel file, and was apparently designed to prevent 'fishing expeditions' to find material to use in cross-examination. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
" The same sort of reasoning explains why a State may outlaw cross burning (and only cross burning) done with the intent to intimidate: "because burning a cross is a particularly virulent form of intimidation. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff further stated: “I damn you all to hell-may your bodies and souls burn in eternal fires” (id.). [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:38 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  (yes, there is such a thing as 4th degree burns). [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm by Steven M. Taber
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm by Steven M. Taber
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm by Steven M. Taber
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]