Search for: "State v. Gross" Results 1421 - 1440 of 4,577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2023, 7:54 am by Eugene Volokh
" In practice, it's hard to find cases where such a standard would likely change the outcome; but Thursday's Washington Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 4:44 pm by Arina Shulga
For example, in Washington state, the default standard is that members do not owe any duties to other members unless an act or omission constitutes gross negligence, intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of the law. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 2:06 pm by Kevin Russell
The United States has filed an amicus brief supporting Nassar. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:56 am by Rosalind English
Therefore he could have no “reasonable expectation” of privacy and Article 8 had not been engaged (X v UK (application No 5877/72) [1973], Friedl v Austria (1995) 21 EHRR 83 and Friend v UK [2010] EHRR SE6). [read post]