Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 173,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
So, he says that Nixon v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:31 am
A fair piece.Even in state law cases. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:25 am
Read the opinion The post DEANDRE MARQUIS ALLEN v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:22 am
SNEED v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:16 am
(See People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 8:22 am
ICJ: Israel’s Actions in the OPT Violate Fundamental Principles of International Law From the start of the opinion, the Court affirmed Israel’s obligations under international law as the occupying power in the OPT. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 6:36 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:30 am
The situation began to change as the court in Nelson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
United States (9th Cir. 1989) (no right of access to ex parte warrant application before indictment); States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 4:51 am
In a post-trial opinion handed down earlier this month by Vice Chancellor Will in Gibson v Konick, the court ordered dissolution of an LLC formed for the purpose of owning a vacation home. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
And that test is the enhanced scrutiny test, as articulated in Coster v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 2:40 am
EEOC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:07 am
No serious patent practitioner will be very surprised by this headnote, which is firmly based on Art. 69 EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation and fully in line with the established national jurisprudence in the UPC member states, notably with German case law. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
One counterintuitive aspect of this First Amendment case is that the plaintiffs were, in fact, violating state insurance laws, and the defendant was responsible for enforcing those laws. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
A recent case, Ohio v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Choi at University of Michigan Law School, and Geeyoung Min at Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
I might think the Constitution should reach more of national life than another person; I think the Court was wrong, for instance, to overrule Roe v. [read post]
