Search for: "State v. M. V."
Results 1421 - 1440
of 29,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Being on the State or a participating employer’s payroll determines eligibility for member service credit in the State's Employees' Retirement SystemMatter of Muccia v DiNapoli, 2010 NY Slip Op 00630, Decided and Entered: January 28, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentMargaret M. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:04 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Haddock, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 303 (07 February 2011) M, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 648 (18 March 2011) Takkar v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 646 (18 March 2011) Attorney Generals Reference No. 73, 75 & 03 of 2010 [2011] EWCA Crim 633 (03 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tradegro (UK) Ltd v Wigmore Street Investments Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 268 (16 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)… [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
If so, I'm sorry. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:52 am
Like Sifuentes v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:10 am
I’m sympathetic to this concern. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:22 am
By Eric Goldman Amaretto Ranch Breedables, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
In Lyng v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 9:37 am
” The 9th Circuit ignored the California state court rulings completely. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
Hodge (Arizona State University), Sarah Wetter (University of Maryland), Emily Carey (Arizona State University), Elyse Pendergrass (Arizona State University), Claudia M. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Galloway v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
Facebook opinion (the court praises that dissent as “influential”–though surely not more influential in California state courts than Barrett v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 5:07 am
Filed March 21, 2007--Opinion by Chief Judge Robert M. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
At the material time Matúz was also the chairman of the Trade Union of Public Service Broadcasters (Közszolgálati Műsorkészítők Szakszervezete). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
As I explain below, I’m not sure if the plaintiffs can overcome the standing problems created by the services’ content moderation freedom. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
United States for radio beepers, so I’m not sure why Judges Ginsburg, Tatel, and Griffith think there is room for that argument here. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:48 pm
(Veera v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 6:03 pm
Similar Fact Evidence and the case of R. v. [read post]
