Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 4,683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2018, 9:33 am
The case is Deere & Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:46 pm
" Lynda V. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:47 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:01 pm
The key to this inquiry is the substitution of the agency for district courts as a decision-maker on patent validity. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Tao Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
The decision-maker considers X’s application in identity Y and citizenship is granted in that identity. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm
Rule in Clibbery v Allan In a sense, the case of Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45, [200] Fam 261, [2002] 2 WLR 1511, [2002] 1 FLR 565 confirms my point; and it represents the common – (judge-made) – law, which cannot be overturned by a rule-maker. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:08 am
Take-Two Interactive case currently pending at the New York Court of Appeals.Lindsay Lohan sued in 2014 Take-Two Interactive, the maker of the “Grand Theft Auto V” video game, claiming that it had used her image when creating the character Lacey Jonas, see here and here, and thus violated her right to privacy under New York Civil Rights Law § 51 by misappropriating her likeness.Reality show star Karen Gravano filed a similar suit, claiming that the character… [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:05 am
Nix, State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 9:37 am
v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Bakers Lose in Oregon Case, But Wedding Singers / Painters / Photographers Might Win
28 Dec 2017, 10:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 12:55 pm
Exeltis USA Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 12:55 pm
Haley v. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
Supreme Court ruling in Daubert v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
As Lord Carnwath concluded after his illuminating discussion of the standard required of planning reasons (at paras 35-42), the question will be “whether the information so provided by the authority leaves room for ‘genuine doubt … as to what (it) has decided and why’” (at para 42, citing Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Clarke Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 66 P & CR 263). [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Topics this month include:Top StoriesUS v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
The oral argument thus renewed the mystery of why the Court granted certiorari in the first place--especially after it had denied the petition in Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
