Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 4,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2009, 4:38 am
The object of this case is a ruling of the Court of First Instance in Schräder v CPVO (Case T-187/06) mentioned on your website in November 2008 [here and here]. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
State, 2011 Fla. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas “finds the United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in Rent-a-Center v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 9:33 am
The outcome of the case, Integrity Staffing Solutions v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:11 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:59 am
Dreeben’s first argument was in a case called United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
IN THE NEWS The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Caulkett and Bank of America v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
In Heien v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:46 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
Bordelon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:37 am
Against the background of recent investment disputes (Philip Morris v Uruguay and Philip Morris v Australia) and recent trade agreements with ISDS norms (the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement, USMCA, and the EU/Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA), this chapter addresses the impact of ISDS on public health regulation.In Chapter 7, the author discusses how the US shaped the provisions on geographical indications in TPP-11. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:23 am
The case is Navigators Insurance Co Ltd v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am
Judge Janice Rogers Brown dissented from the ruling, arguing that FERC does not have the authority to take action to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of pipelines it approves, and thus is not obligated to analyze some impacts, stating “[t]he truth is that FERC has no control over whether the power plants that will emit these greenhouse gases will come into existence or remain in operation” (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
