Search for: "State v. Waters"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 9,937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2013, 1:29 pm
Access the Sahu v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 3:23 pm
State of California (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)Longo v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 11:50 am
The US Supreme Court announced its ruling in Florida v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
As China’s blue-water navy grows, international freedom of navigation will become more importan [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:25 pm
Plaintiffs, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and several conservation groups, argued that in 2005 the United States Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau) renewed forty-one water service contracts with various water users without conducting an adequate consultation under § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act and that the contracts jeopardize the existence of the delta smelt. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:09 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 5:25 pm
Since its signing, disputes between the states over water use focus on the compact’s terms. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:45 am
In Morgan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:55 am
The state court decision in Held v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:48 pm
Navajo Nation (Water rights) Department of the Interior v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Rapanos is similarly distinguishable because the legal questions in that case dealt with the exclusion of certain water bodies from the “waters of the United States. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:49 am
Betz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:37 am
Precision was performing work involving the identification of residential connections with storm, sanitary and water pipes in order to bore a path for a new water main. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 6:09 am
Here is the opinion in Dept. of Ecology v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 11:03 am
Privacy and data security issues and concerns do not stop at the water’s edge. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:31 am
In this case, the inmate successfully argues that a jury may find that he was the victim of First Amendment retaliation in jail.The case is Ford v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:04 am
And, since Holland could not drink water, he was unable to discharge any urine. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:55 am
In City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
