Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 1421 - 1440 of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2021, 2:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Of the 116 total settlements in 2021, the court venue with the most cases was once again The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, however only two of the largest ten settlements took place in the SDNY. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:39 am by Florian Mueller
The first thing that happened was that the court assigned the case to Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson, who has a strong antitrust background but (a) is based in San Francisco and (b) handled discovery-related matters for Judge YGR in Epic Games v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:14 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
On January 19, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:27 am
The High Court decision in Alberta v Katanga dealt with two separate questions that are of interest. [read post]