Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:51 am
Doe v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 10:02 am
Doe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:39 am
The case is Martinez v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Defendant's California conviction for grand theft from a person in violation of section 487(2) of the California Penal Code was a "violent felony" as defined in 18 U.S.C. section 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:33 am
” It will be interesting to see if the California Supreme Court takes an appeal from one of these cases. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Clancy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:29 am
Quoting Cohen v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 07-5180 In a case brought by a police officer alleging that, after an altercation at a bar while he was off duty, he was unlawfully required to take the breathalyzer test in violation of his constitutional rights, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) under a totality-of-the-circumstances analysis, plaintiff was not seized when he submitted to the breathalyzer test, but was only afraid he would be terminated or suspended… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Having a realistic awareness of who commits sexual offenses can help to foster a more comprehensive appreciation of the phenomenon of sexual abuse in society. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Rodriquez (06-1646), asking whether, for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, courts must look only at the maximum sentence under state law for a particular drug offense or may also take sentencing enhancements based on prior convictions into account, and in Begay v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 3:13 pm
The case is People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:01 pm
However, this year, the California Supreme Court ruled in Gattuso v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 9:17 pm
California, profanity and offensive speech is constitutionally protected, outside of narrow categories (such as fighting words or threats) that simply do not arise in the context of a crowd of 15,000 screaming sports fans. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 10:47 pm
" Sure, LSU v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
Accordingly plaintiffs might divide into 100 classes which each take 1 percent. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:50 am
The California Supremes should take both cases up. [read post]
