Search for: "The Answer Group, Inc."
Results 1421 - 1440
of 3,357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Although the Hong Kong Court has not delivered any definitive answer on the role and liability of Google Inc., in a summary application, the German Court has rightly recognised the novel legal challenge that search engine prediction technology presents and treated search engines as a special intermediary processor. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
First, a quick note on the government's new final rules regarding the religious accommodation (including its extension to some for-profit employers such as Hobby Lobby, Inc.). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 5:36 am
A UnitedHealth Group Inc. unit, Optum Inc., is also a major player. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:28 pm
On August 22, 2007, TM executed a mortgage on the property in favor of plaintiff's predecessor, ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. to secure a loan in the amount of $340,000.00. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
They left Weil in 2011 to form Tensegrity Law Group LLP (“Tensegrity”). [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
They left Weil in 2011 to form Tensegrity Law Group LLP (“Tensegrity”). [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
They left Weil in 2011 to form Tensegrity Law Group LLP (“Tensegrity”). [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
They left Weil in 2011 to form Tensegrity Law Group LLP (“Tensegrity”). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
See Rentokil Group Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:53 pm
These changes were seen as overruling the prior rule from Holmes Group that the existence of a patent law counterclaim in the answer-pleading (rather than claim in the complaint). [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:07 am
Mei Lin… My own arrival at Citi answers this question in part. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:31 pm
SS filed an Answer. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Both parties in the matter, per the decision of the TTAB earlier, agreed on two specific questions that needed to be answered in determining whether a mark contains matter that may disparage Native Americans:1. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. and a related order, Wang v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. and a related order, Wang v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 10:50 am
This is a dispute between two defendants—Frontier Communications, Inc. and Navigant Consulting Group, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
Under the standard set forth by the US Supreme Court in Adarand Constructors Inc v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
Under the standard set forth by the US Supreme Court in Adarand Constructors Inc v Pena (65 EPD ¶43,366 (1995)), to survive constitutional review, a government entity’s consideration of race has to meet strict scrutiny standards; thus, it must: (1) serve a compelling state interest; and (2) be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:16 pm
It cannot be read-in by one group of defendants as evidence to be used against the other defendant. [read post]
