Search for: "Thomas Read"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 15,918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
” Justice Clarence Thomas likewise speculated that “someone could be triggered” by statements that were not intended to be threatening. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:24 pm
” Justice Clarence Thomas was also troubled by this idea. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:25 am
’” Further Reading: Tech Firms Try to Muzzle Workers With NDAs, SEC Tipsters Say Apple Whistleblower Thomas Le Bonniec The post Big Tech Illegally Uses NDAs to Silence Would-Be-Whistleblowers, SEC Tips Allege appeared first on Whistleblower Network News. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:50 am
" I'm sure the Chief Justice wants to appear before the Senate as much as he enjoys reading my blog posts. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 8:48 am
Continue reading [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:47 am
As Justice Clarence Thomas noted in his concurrence, the appeals court must apply a highly deferential standard of review—treating the agency’s record as conclusive, provided there is substantial evidentiary support. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
However, she seemed to retreat from her position in responses to questions from Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:47 pm
Justices Thomas, who initiated the questioning for the Court, displayed some sympathy to the difficulty of requiring a company to defend its interpretation of ambiguous regulations. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 9:44 am
Who reads all of the statute anyway? [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:34 am
Lawrence, Detroit Free Press) Double whammy: Supreme Court slaps down separate bids from Novartis, Sanofi (Fraiser Kansteiner, Fierce Pharma) An Abortion Drug Tests the Supreme Court (David Cole, The New York Review of Books) Senate Dems weighing a Clarence Thomas invite to future Supreme Court ethics hearing (Katherine Tully-Mcmanus & Burgess Everett, Politico) The post The morning read for Wednesday, April 19 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:45 am
Determining this portion requires determining the number of all truly essential patents reading on the standard (and ideally, though close to impossible, their validity and technical importance), a lengthy and complicated exercise that no individual implementer can afford to engage in. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
At oral argument, Thomas Hungar of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP argued for Slack; Kevin Russell of Goldstein, Russell & Woofter LLC argued for Pirani. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 10:27 am
” In the same vein, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan seemed to read the text of Section 11 as plainly barring the action on the facts of Slack’s listing. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 6:27 am
(Mark Joseph Stern, Slate) The post The morning read for Tuesday, April 18 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 3:37 am
View this document on Scribd Thomas v. ooShirts, Inc. et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:40 am
The federal government counters that the EEOC and courts have actually “long understood” the Supreme Court’s decision in Hardison to provide more protection for religious employees “than the ‘de minimis’ language read in isolation might suggest. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:17 am
Here’s the Monday morning read: Supreme Court allows $6 billion student loan debt settlement (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) Supreme Court considers Christian mail carrier’s refusal to work Sundays (Andrew Chung, Reuters) Clarence Thomas has for years claimed income from a defunct real estate firm (Shawn Boburg & Emma Brown, The Washington Post) The Supreme Court takes up a messy, chaotic case about religion in the workplace (Ian Millhiser, Vox) States try to protect… [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 7:59 pm
It is precisely for that reason alone that the essay is worthy of a careful read. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 3:49 pm
Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern in Slate (with maybe the best pun in an article title I’ve ever seen): When news broke last week, by way of dogged reporting in ProPublica, that Justice Clarence Thomas had accepted decades’ worth… Continue reading The post “Quid Pro Crow” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:58 pm
See, for example, these descriptions of Justices Gorsuch, Kagan, Alito, Kavanaugh Roberts, Thomas, Sotomayor, Coney-Barrett, Brown Jackson, Scalia all use the same word: “affable. [read post]
