Search for: "UNKNOWN LEGAL COUNSEL" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,737
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 2:18 pm
Selling medicine over the Internet sometimes falls within telemedicine practice, but practitioners should beware of separate federal and state rules that address online prescribing. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
If that legal advice was lacking in any particular way, the parties each have their rights against their legal practitioner. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 1:47 pm
An article in the Wall Street Journal and another in Packer News report that "in an email" to an unknown source, Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) said it will issue I-9 audit notices to over a 1000 employers as part of its national strategy to get more employers to stop hiring workers without legal employment status. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 1:10 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The complaint alleges that “counsel for the Museum was contacted by the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Missouri in St. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:53 pm by Paul A. Prados
§ 1988 if we win a new lawsuit.A Final NoteCongratulations are in order for the Know Campaign and its counsel, Anthony “Tony” F. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Likely unknown to the public, PI and Med Mal firms often "take" a case by having a Blumberg retainer signed which might have the language "for investigation" or "for medical records" or some other modifier. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 11:36 pm by Joe Markowitz
  The mediator is not as familiar with the facts as the parties and counsel, and the parties don't always tell the mediator everything about their case. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm by Aaron
Further, the Court found that the court’s in-chambers conferences dealing with purely legal matters did not violate Mr. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm by Gideon
Scott Greenfield took note, writing favorably about the actions of Twitter’s legal counsel, Alexander Macgillivray: There isn’t a criminal law specialist at major law firm in this country who would have advised this fledgling behemoth to fight the government. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:55 am by Hunter Biederman
As a former General Counsel and Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the State Bar, I am very concerned with the legal profession's ability to govern itself. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
Plaintiffs’ Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341 (2001), an implied preemption case, the court considered whether there was something in the FDCA – other than the §360k(a) preemption clause – that preempted the fraud on the FDA claims the plaintiffs claimed fell within Lohr’s “parallel” violation rationale. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:40 am by Michelle Harner
I commend the students who took the class, not only for their performance during the semester but for having the willingness to try something new and unknown in the third year of their law school experience. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:09 pm by Bexis
Ohio, like most states doesn't impose any duty to warn of scientifically unknown information:There is no duty to warn of unknown and unknowable hazards. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm
Plaintiffs are informed and believe that the party defendant that has appeared as "The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth" -- but which has no affiliation with The Episcopal Church -- is either a faction not recognized by the Church or an entity of unknown form . . . [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Debris Debates in UM Cases A line of cases came down in 2010, holding that where a single vehicle accident is caused by debris in the roadway from an unknown or unidentified source, an uninsured motorist carrier does not need to provide UM benefits when its policy [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The plaintiff argued that the tortfeasor should be bound in the third-party action by the previous UIM award, because State Farm had assigned counsel to represent its interests in that matter and the State Farm arbitrator did not dissent from the UIM panel's decision. [read post]