Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 9,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2019, 12:52 pm
That ruling ended the cases on the merits and is not at issue here.Before us is the court’s later grant of Hi-Tech’s and Vital’s motions for attorney’s fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Automed Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 3:43 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.NMT Medical, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:44 am
Complaint alleges NEPA, MMPA, ESA violations A new lawsuit filed by Chickaloon Native Village, Natural Resources Defense Council, Center for Biological Diversity and the Center for Water Advocacy alleges violations of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy Act in connection with the National Marine Fisheries Service’s issuance of an Incidental Harassment Authorization for seismic surveys in Cook Inlet (Chickaloon Native Village… [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:29 pm
Divergence at the national court level – is a a fresh CJEU reference required? [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
Seeking an ArrowArrow declarations can be granted: Fujifilm v AbbVieGuestKat Eibhlin Vardy discusses Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co., Ltd v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 1, which involves two appeals, both raising the question of whether a Court can grant a so called ‘Arrow declaration’, i.e. a declaration that “a product was old or obvious in patent law terms at a particular date”.Guest Post - China's Patent… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:03 pm
In Trail v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 6:11 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Wechsler v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 4:31 am
Kovach v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 1:15 pm
Citizens Coalition Los Angeles v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
At one level, the case once again raised issued about the use of excessive pleading standards to deny owners their obvious inspection rights. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Most famously, all fifty states make 21 the legal drinking age because in the most important pre-Sebelius conditional funding case, South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
Colon is, however, ambiguous as to the level of discretion afforded to police officers by the impugned Dutch provision and it was decided on the narrow issue of whether the Convention requires prior judicial authorisation for such powers. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
The government moved to dismiss the case, and Judge Richard Mark Gergel granted the motion. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
It also noted that “[d]espite this holding, the JonesCourt did not address whether the government must obtain a warrant to install and use a GPS tracking device, and if not, what level of suspicion is required, reasonable suspicion or probable cause. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 11:41 am
Darden v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 7:16 am
v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:32 am
In Blount v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:00 am
On August 18, 2023, the Fifth Circuit sitting en banc in Hamilton v. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 1:10 pm
The stop and ensuing actions were legal, and the motion to suppress should not have been granted. [read post]
