Search for: "United States v. Craft"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,899
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:27 am
The federal court in San Antonio, Texas emphasized that it was not ruling on the validity of the legislative plans under VRA Section 2 or the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:33 am
Taking into account both federal and state lawsuit filings, M&A-related lawsuits now outnumber federal securities lawsuit filings and M&A-related litigation is now the lawsuit of choice for many plaintiffs’ securities attorneys. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm
This Court has recognized that Section 5′s intrusion on state sovereignty raises serious constitutional questions” (citing the 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:16 am
Judulang’s fitness to remain in the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
” Emphasizing the dispute over state-federal relations in Arizona v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Raniere v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Whether a particular property has “wetlands” as defined by the Federal Wetland Delineation Manual and whether the wetlands constitute “waters of the United States” is not a matter easily discernable by anybody. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:58 pm
Salon has a piece on United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Thus, a case like State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Thus, a case like State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:19 pm
The Supreme Court summed up how the severability doctrine is to work in a 1992 decision, New York v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 2:42 am
On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
., v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:10 am
Congress did not make the reduction retroactive, while asserting that the change was needed because the law was patently unfair.As Judge Evans explained in his decision for a unanimous 7th Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
