Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 3:00 am by Paul Caron
United States, No. 09-837 (Jan. 11, 2011): Kristin Hickman (Minnesota), Goodbye National Muffler! [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:13 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Third party lending to finance litigation first arose in Australia, and then spread to the United Kingdom. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:25 pm by Paul Caron
United States, No. 09-837 (Jan. 11, 2011), the Supreme Court has finally and decisively rejected the notion of tax exceptionalism in judicial review standards. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 10:52 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This was made clear in the 1972, Texas Supreme Court case, The Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:59 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  I'm taking credit for calling this one pretty much correctly.The net inflation rate of the United States for CY 2010 will be in excess of 4%. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:37 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
  At another level, a bankruptcy lawyer is a citizen of the United States, and is himself entitled to the protection of speech accorded all other citizens of the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:26 am by SOIssues
Volungus, 595 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2010); United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm by WIMS
Before police from the City of Rosemount, Minnesota were notified and arrived at the scene, people, homes, and vehicles were contaminated. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 5:13 pm by Rich Cassidy
The town hall style program was conducted to inform the bar and policy makers of  the implications of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. [read post]