Search for: "Young v. People" Results 1421 - 1440 of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm by Larry
Like the court in GRK, Customs and Border Protection looked back to an old case call United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Danielle Hindley is a chatty beautician aged 34 who lives in the former mining village of Kippax, near Leeds. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday the Court will also hear the appeal of The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) – a challenge of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014, Pt 4, which introduces a “named person service” requiring providers of children’s services to make available an identified individual whose general function is to promote, support or safeguard the wellbeing of each child or young person, on behalf of the… [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 12:52 pm by Eva Lopez
   We also filed an amicus brief challenging President Trump’s revocation of DACA, which provides legal status and work privileges to 700,000 undocumented young people who were brought to the U.S. as children. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
"), with ECF No. 2,16 ("The young people who are parties to this litigation have already faced threats, harassment, and safety concerns. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am by John Elwood
David Dubin worked for his father’s company providing mental-health testing to young people at emergency shelters. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Maryland, to argue that people have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their phone records under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
” Should all young European children recognize every depiction of the person of Jesus? [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 12:05 pm by Amy Howe
New York, he noted, it applied rational-basis review to a law that made it a crime for brick-and-mortar stores to sell pornographic magazines to young people. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
After that hearing, at which scientific literature was introduced and doctors for both the planitiffs and defendants testified, Justice Mayer ruled that plaintiffs would not be allowed to offer expert testimony at trial in support of their MCS claims:In New York, evidence based on novel scientific theories or techniques is considered admissible only upon a showing of general acceptance within the relevant scientific community (People v Carrieri, 49 AD3d 660, 854 NYS2d 427 [2d Dept… [read post]