Search for: "*long v. U. S" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2011, 10:27 pm by Howard Knopf
Katz - who teaches both competition and copyright law at the U. of T. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 6:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
And note that, given that case, the speech need not even be about one of the recipients, so long as it’s intended to annoy or offend one of the recipients. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
A few random thoughts on the cases after the jump. 1) These cases, along with last month’s Already LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm by Susan Brenner
After noting the factual basis for the charges against Davis, the judge outlined the standard of review he was to apply in ruling on her motion for a new trial: A district court, `[u]pon the defendant's motion . . . may vacate any judgment and grant a new trial if the interest of justice so requires. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Thus, New Jersey looks, as we do, to the character and "extent of the clergyman's activities" (Friends of Ahi Ezer Congregation, Inc. v Long Branch City, 16 NJ Tax at 595 [1997]; see also Shrine of Our Lady of Fatima v Mantua Twp., 12 NJ Tax 392, 397-398 [1992]). [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Stone v Moore [2016] SASCFC 50 allowed the defendant’s appeal against a judgment dismissing an action for libel and awarded damages of Aus$2,000. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:00 am by SHG
S. 378, 384 (1987);United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:01 am by Jay Eng
Such a rule contravenes Basic’s fundamental premise—that an investor presumptively relies on a misrepresentation so long as it was reflected in the market price at the time of his transaction. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am by William C. MacLeod
Clues as to the nature of the public interest appeared among the plan’s more specific objectives. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
I’ve pretty much just described the circumstances present in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], a post-trial decision handed down earlier this month by Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Rivera v Kerr  2019 NY Slip Op 33047(U) October 11, 2019 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 17736/2015 Judge: Sanford Neil Berland is also notable for having 7 prior judges all recuse themselves. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:55 am by Michael Froomkin
[Note to self: Mayoral candidate has a "u"; District 7 candidate has an "o" O's for everyone: Robaina. [read post]