Search for: "AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION " Results 1441 - 1460 of 8,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2015, 12:39 pm by Old Fox
Yet they cannot indulge it, except by the sacrifice of their principles, and the conscious violation of their duties. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 7:48 am by Matthew Wein
Thinking through the specifics bring into sharp relief precisely how invidious the methods required to put this policy into action might be. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm by Jon
Power needs to be divided in a way that allows for checks and balances, but which does not prevent action when action is urgent. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:00 pm
Global Drilling Company To Pay $290,000 For Racial Harassment, Including Nooses EEOC settled discrimination lawsuit for $290,000 and injunctive relief on behalf of African American men subjected to racially hostile work environment on oil rig, including hangman's nooses displayed, derogatory racial language, and race-based name cal The Truth About Integrity Tests: The Validity and Utility of Integrity Testing for the Hospitality Industry Integrity tests can help employers determine… [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 12:10 pm by Matthew Landis
Libel is when the action is in writing or another print medium, and slander is when the damaging action is verbal. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:05 pm by Cary Coglianese
   Just asking this question may seem unsettling to Americans deeply suspicious of governmental power. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:14 am by David Post
We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:44 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Professor Pati appraises the American actions in terms of international law’s due process guarantees and proposes courses of action which can better defend a public order of human dignity. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 2:17 am
John Yoo defends his memos:Imposing Fourth Amendment standards on military action would have made the Civil War unwinnable -- combat occurred wholly on U.S. territory and enemy soldiers were American citizens. [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Among the stimulating issues he approaches are the democratic potential of civil disobedience, the hazards of applying originalism rather than living tree jurisprudence in the interpretation of Aboriginal and treaty rights, American legislative actions that could also animate Indigenous self-determination in Canada, and the opportunity for Indigenous governmental action to address violence against women. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:24 pm
The Ethisphere blog post, as commented on there by yours truly, elaborates on “class action attorneys’ respon[se] to EU's plea to sue companies ‘American Style’”. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 2:45 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
TELUS 2011 SCC 15 which adopted the competence-competence principle which is directly set forth in Article 16. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 7:53 pm
 Now, it appears, others in the Western camp are beginning to align with American policy in the operation of their global production chains, especially, when they transact the Xinjiang region. [read post]
31 May 2016, 5:53 am by Paul Rosenzweig
If country X says you must do action A on the Internet and it applies worldwide and country Y says you must NOT do action A on the Internet and it applies worldwide, how would that work? [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” She invoked RFRA to defend her violent actions and was sentenced to only probation.Another excellent example of RFRA’s toxic nature was displayed in Burwell v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 8:04 pm
  In this way he draws a distinction between the principles, to which Xu declares firm allegiance, and the individuals whose actions, he will now argue, who have failed in their duty to those principles. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 6:04 pm
We urge you to take all available measures to expeditiously investigate these allegations and take swift and appropriate action based on those findings... [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
The terms of the agreement were restated in a further agreement in 1970, then further clarified in a letter in 1975.In this action before Nugee J, Merck alleged that MSD had used its trade mark without consent. [read post]