Search for: "B. v. S."
Results 1441 - 1460
of 52,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2024, 9:12 am
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Monday Snyder v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 7:16 pm
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Concepcion v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 5:46 pm
Issue summaries are from Scotusblog, which also links to papers: Wednesday U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:36 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:31 am
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Mellouli v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:10 am
A recent case out of the Northern District of Texas, Cooper v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:27 am
SEARCH & SEIZURE/SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:21 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in Culbertson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:51 am
Dominguez Ojeda v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:18 am
§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 2:12 am
R (Pereira) v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 4:05 am
P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss standard set forth in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 3:01 am
(NA), LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:18 am
Editor's Note: The following post comes to us from Eduardo Gallardo and Robert B. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
LottoTron, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 11:23 am
§ 1071(b) rather than appealing the TTAB’s decision to the Federal Circuit pursuant to [...] [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 12:13 pm
Tax law — Tax-court jurisdiction — Systems connections charges Brutus 630, LLC (“Brutus”), appellant and assignee of NVR Inc. d/b/a Ryan Homes (“NVR”), appeals an order from the Circuit Court for Harford County affirming the Tax Court’s grant of the Town of Bel Air’s (“the Town”), appellee, motion to dismiss. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 11:12 am
“Subsections (a) and (b) provide valuable context. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
Key Insight: Privileged docs based on only state law must be produced in a case with both federal and state claims Nature of Case: Medical malpractice Electronic Data Involved: Responsive documents Keywords: Privilege, state law Identified State Rule(s): K.S.A. section 65-4925(a) Identified Federal Rule(s): FRCP 26(b) [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
Key Insight: Recorded phone call between party and copyright agent regarding image timing confidential at prelitigation phase Nature of Case: copyright dispute Electronic Data Involved: phone call recording Keywords: protective order, confidential phone call, work-product Identified State Rule(s): FRBC Rule 4-4.1, 4-1.2 Identified Federal Rule(s): 26(b)(3), 37(a)(5) View Case Opinion [read post]
