Search for: "Bank Line v. United States"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2008, 2:59 pm
In Sims v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 3:48 pm
The issue before the court in Morrison v National Australia Bank was whether to excercise subject matter jurisdiction over the foreign claimants who bought their NAB shares on a foreign exchange. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
One such so-called maxim originated with Justice Stone's "Footnote Four" in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 6:02 pm
National Australia Bank, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit limited the ability of U.S. courts to hear claims brought on behalf of non-U.S. investors who purchased shares of non-U.S. companies on non-U.S. exchanges. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
The fear of losing supply triggers consumers to fill up more frequently, causing long lines at stations. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 4:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:15 pm
§ 455 and Canons 3C(1) and 3D of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:29 pm
V. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 1:37 pm
Now it's true Congress authorized the creation of Conrail, and it was a private corporation all of whose stock was owned by the United States. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 3:26 pm
A pretty good panel gives us a pretty disappointing decision, in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP – take it to the bank: seminar covering valuing intellectual assets and using them to leverage financing: (IP finance) What’s risk got to do with it? [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
" United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
Financial Institution Employees (Seattle-First National Bank), 475 U.S. 192 (1986), cast grave uncertainty on that standard. [read post]
