Search for: "Barnett v. Barnett" Results 1441 - 1460 of 1,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies We have already mentioned the statements in open court in the cases of Grant v MGN and Hames v NGN. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
’  We had posts about this by Steve Barnett and Martin Moore. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Rulings               IPSO has published a series of rulings and two Resolution Statements from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement – 00226-18 Sachania v The Times – Resolved via IPSO Mediation Resolution Statement – 00895-18 A Man v Mail Online – Resolved via IPSO Mediation 03351-16 – A Man v The Argus (Brighton) – No breach of Principles 1 (Accuracy) and… [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
IPSO 19756-23 Saunders v mirror.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19679-23 Saunders v walesonline.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement 18579-23 Reynolds v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediated 18539-23 Garnier v Tenbury Wells Advertiser, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigatio 17700-23… [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
” We published a response to this from Steve Barnett, who called the difference between the two regulators “a chasm, not a cigarette paper”. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am by Venkat Balasubramani
"] Other aspects of the dispute that had intersting and recurring social media tweaks: other public employee cases have raised the similar issue of whether the employee was speaking as a citizen or an employee; the law is employer-favorable, but I would not be surprised to see an appeals court give her another chance (this aspect of the dispute vaguely reminds me of Bland v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The article draws context from the upcoming case of Carpenter v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  Or as, Professor Steven Barnett put it on Twitter “Today one unaccountable tabloid editor attempts to undermine the integrity of 11 independent judges. [read post]