Search for: "C-Risk, Inc" Results 1441 - 1460 of 3,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2020, 1:00 am by Alex Woolgar
The application was opposed under sections 3(1)(b), 3(1)(c) and 3(1)(d) Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Netflix, Inc. rejects that claim, giving four reasons why not, including: [P]laintiffs' strict liability claim fails because it is premised on the content and dissemination of the show. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:15 pm by WIMS
Access the results of EPA's impoundment assessments (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Niles, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Monday, November 14, 2022 Tags: Board of Directors, Proxy fights, Proxy materials, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Shareholder activism ESG and C: Does Cybersecurity Deserve Its Own Pillar in ESG Frameworks? [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Niles, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Monday, November 14, 2022 Tags: Board of Directors, Proxy fights, Proxy materials, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Shareholder activism ESG and C: Does Cybersecurity Deserve Its Own Pillar in ESG Frameworks? [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
   Sarah Feingold, Etsy, Inc.: Free speech—we need the internet as it is, doing pretty well. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. 449, 468 (2007) (lead opinion) (citation omitted); id. at 495 (Scalia, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment) (likewise rejecting a test based on speaker motivation). [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
GuestKat Peter Ling discusses the Opinion of AG Pitruzzella in case C-688/17 concerning the intriguing question of whether a “launch at risk” (i.e. the commercialization of a product without first suing for cancellation of any relevant patents prior to market entry) should exclude any compensation in the event that an IP right is wrongly issued. [read post]
17 Aug 2024, 12:03 pm by Chris Castle
As required by generally accepted auditing standards, the auditors tell us that they got smart about the MLC and the world it operates in: In performing our audit in accordance with GAAS, we gained an understanding of MLC and its environment in accordance with AU-C Section 315 Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement (“AU-C Section 315”), as issued by the American Institute of Certified Public… [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm by Matthew Nied
In the companion cases of Breeden v Black, 2012 SCC 19 (“Breeden”) and Éditions Écosociété Inc. et al. v Banro Corp., 2012 SCC 18 (“Banro”), the Supreme Court of Canada clarified the manner in which courts should determine whether to exercise jurisdiction over multijurisdictional defamation claims involving foreign defendants. [read post]