Search for: "C. M. v. State" Results 1441 - 1460 of 6,590
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
;(d) section 721(m) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4565(m));(e) the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.); and(f) section 1304 of title 19, United States Code.Sec. 3. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:16 am
Respondents & Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica Cristina M. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am by Thalia Kruger
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
While I’m starting with the United States Copyright Act for reasons explained in an earlier column, such reform will work only if they work everywhere. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Chapter 11 of the “Canadian Health Law Practice Manual,” Genetics and the Law, Amy Zarzeczny, Tracey M. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has a post “Parliaments and the GDPR” concerned the CJEU case, Case C-272/19 VK v Land Hessen (EU:C:2020:535). [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
McGarity, Michael C. [read post]